Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2006

A review of burial dating methods using 26Al and 10Be

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DGDarryl E. Granger

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Darryl E. Granger (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7eedc319e71454dbedda9https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2415(01)
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Minimum 10Be exposure ages of early Pliocene for the Table Mountain plateau and the Sirius Group at Mount Fleming, Dry Valleys, Antarctica1995 · 100 citations
  2. 2Constraints on age, erosion, and uplift of Neogene glacial deposits in the Transantarctic Mountains determined from in situ cosmogenic 10Be and 26Al1995 · 125 citations
  3. 3Lower Pliocene Hominid Remains from Sterkfontein2003 · 235 citations
  4. 4Half‐life of <sup>26</sup>Al1983 · 163 citations