Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental philosophy brings empirical methods to philosophy. These methods are used to probe how people think about philosophically interesting things such as knowledge, morality, and freedom. This paper explores the contribution that qualitative methods have to make in this enterprise. I argue that qualitative methods have the potential to make a much greater contribution than they have so far. Along the way, I acknowledge a few types of resistance that proponents of qualitative methods in experimental philosophy might encounter, and provide reasons to think they are ill-founded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Andow (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: