What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate the accuracy of the Bayley-III scale in detecting developmental delay among young children.

April 1, 2010Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Underestimation of Developmental Delay by the New Bayley-III Scale

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

PAPeter J. AndersonRutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Observational analysis reveals underestimation of developmental delay in two-year-old Australian children, indicating potential underdiagnosis in standard pediatric screening.

Key Points

To evaluate the accuracy of the Bayley-III scale in detecting developmental delay among young children.
Assessed neurodevelopmental performance in a cohort of 2-year-old Australian children using the Bayley-III scale.
Demonstrated that the Bayley-III scale substantially underestimates the presence and severity of developmental delay in 2-year-old children.

Cite This Study

Peter J. Anderson (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7f950a2a48916bbbee8e9 https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.20

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Observational analysis reveals underestimation of developmental delay in two-year-old Australian children, indicating potential underdiagnosis in standard pediatric screening.

Underestimation of Developmental Delay by the New Bayley-III Scale

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Underestimation of Developmental Delay by the New Bayley-III Scale

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider