Why the study?
Normal reference ranges are required to interpret quantitative CMR parameters, and many new publications have emerged since the 2020 review to provide updated estimates.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Updated reference values review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Updated CMR normal values aid quantitative interpretation now; extends 2020 review with recent data but leaves standardization open.
Quantitative assessment of morphological and functional cardiac parameters by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is essential for research and routine clinical practice. Beyond established parameters of chamber size and function, tissue properties such as relaxation times play an increasing role. Normal reference ranges are required for interpretation of results obtained by quantitative CMR. Since the last publication of the "normal values review" in 2020 many new publications related to CMR reference values have been published, which were integrated in this update. The larger sample size provides greater statistical confidence in the estimates of upper and lower limits, and enables further partitioning, e.g., by age and ethnicity for several parameters. Previous topics were expanded by new sections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawel‐Boehm et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: