Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Here, we present a non-animal testing battery to identify PSLT (poorly soluble, low toxicity) substances based on their solubility in phagolysosomal lung fluid simulant, surface reactivity and effects on alveolar macrophages in vitro. This is exemplified by eleven organic pigments belonging to five chemical classes that cover a significant share of the European market. Three of the pigments were tested as both, nanoform and non-nanoform. The results obtained in this integrated non-animal testing battery qualified two pigments as non PSLT, one pigment as poorly soluble and eight pigments as poorly soluble and low toxicity in vitro. The low toxic potency of the eight PSLT and the one poorly soluble pigment was corroborated by short-term inhalation studies with rats. These pigments did not elicit apparent toxic effects at 10 mg/m³ (systemic and in the respiratory tract). One of the pigments, Diarylide Pigment Yellow 83 transparent, however, caused minimal infiltration of neutrophils; hence its low toxicity is ambiguous and needs further verification or falsification. The present test battery provides an opportunity to identify PSLT-properties of test substances to prioritise particles for further development. Thus, it can help to reduce animal testing and steer product development towards safe applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stratmann et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: