Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract A simple, solution‐processed route to the development of MoO x thin‐films using oxomolybdate precursors is presented. The chemical, structural, and electronic properties of these species are characterized in detail, within solution and thin‐films, using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, grazing angle Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, atomic force microscopy, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy. These analyses show that under suitable deposition conditions the resulting solution processed MoO x thin‐films possess the appropriate morphological and electronic properties to be suitable for use in organic electronics. This is exemplified through the fabrication of poly(3‐hexylthiophene):6,6‐phenyl C 61 butyric acid methyl ester (P3HT:PC 61 BM) bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells and comparisons to the traditionally used poly(3,4‐ethyldioxythiophene)/poly(styrenesulfonate) anode modifying layer.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jasieniak et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d84fe652654bb436d19106 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201102622
Jacek J. Jasieniak
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute
Jason Seifter
Freedom Photonics (United States)
Jang Jo
LG (United States)
Advanced Functional Materials
University of California, Santa Barbara
Materials Science & Engineering
CSIRO Manufacturing
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: