Why the study?
The authors sought to investigate the effectiveness of a comprehensive telehealth programme combining telemonitoring and telecoaching on HF hospitalisations and mortality compared to usual care in a real-world setting.
Does a comprehensive telehealth programme combining telemonitoring and telecoaching reduce heart failure hospitalisations and mortality in high-risk ambulatory heart failure patients with recent hospitalisation?
Does a comprehensive telehealth programme combining telemonitoring and telecoaching reduce heart failure hospitalisations and mortality in high-risk ambulatory heart failure patients with recent hospitalisation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A comprehensive telehealth program combining daily telemonitoring and telecoaching significantly reduces heart failure hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in high-risk ambulatory heart failure patients.
Telemedicine has been shown to improve the outcome of heart failure (HF) patients in addition to medical and device therapy. We investigate the effectiveness of a comprehensive telehealth programme in patients with recent hospitalisation for HF on subsequent HF hospitalisations and mortality compared to usual care in a real-world setting. The telehealth programme consists of daily remote telemonitoring of HF signs/symptoms and regular individualised telecoaching sessions. Between January 2018 and September 2020, 119,715 patients of a German health insurer were hospitalised for HF and were eligible for participation in the programme. Finally, 6065 HF patients at high risk for re-hospitalisation were enroled. Participants were retrospectively compared to a propensity score matched usual care group (n = 6065). Median follow-up was 442 days (IQR 309-681). Data from the health insurer was used to evaluate outcomes. After one year, the number of hospitalisations for HF (17.9 vs. 21.8 per 100 patient years, p < 0.001), all-cause hospitalisations (129.0 vs. 133.2 per 100 patient years, p = 0.015), and the respective days spent in hospital (2.0 vs. 2.6 days per year, p < 0.001, and 12.0 vs. 13.4, p < 0.001, respectively) were significantly lower in the telehealth than in the usual care group. Moreover, participation in the telehealth programme was related to a significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to usual care (5.8 vs. 11.0 %, p < 0.001). In a real-life setting of ambulatory HF patients at high risk for re-hospitalisation, participation in a comprehensive telehealth programme was related to a reduction of HF hospitalisations and all-cause mortality compared to usual care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knoll et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: