Tailored telemonitoring did not significantly reduce heart failure hospitalizations compared with usual care over 1 year (9.1% vs 13.5%; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.35-1.17; P=0.151).
RCT (n=382)
randomized
Yes
Effect estimate: HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.35-1.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.1% vs 13.5%
p-value: p=0.151
AIMS: Recent increases in heart failure tend to overload the healthcare system. Consequently, there is a need for innovative strategies to reduce heart failure hospitalizations. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicentre randomized controlled trial was carried out to test the hypothesis that telemonitoring reduces heart failure hospitalizations during 1 year follow-up. The mean age of the 382 participating patients was 71.5 (32-93) years; the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.38, and in 61% it was ≤0.45%. Mean time to first heart failure-related hospitalization was 161 days for the intervention group and 139 days for the usual-care group; hospitalizations occurred in 18 (9.1%) compared with 25 (13.5%) patients, with a total number of 24 and 43 hospitalizations, respectively Kaplan-Meier P = 0.151, hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-1.17. Subgroup analysis of the primary endpoint showed benefits for three subgroups: duration of heart failure, having a pacemaker, and co-habiting. The combined endpoint of heart failure admission and all-cause mortality was similar for both groups (Kaplan-Meier P = 0.641, HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.83). No differences were found regarding secondary endpoints, except for the reduced number of face to face contacts with the heart failure nurse (Mann-Whitney P < 0.001). Mortality was 18 (9.1%) in the intervention group and 12 (6.5%) in the usual-care group (Mann-Whitney P = 0.34, Cox regression analysis P = 0.82). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were found regarding the primary endpoint, possibly caused by a relative underpowering of the population combined with well-treated study groups. However, telemonitoring tends to reduce heart failure (re)admissions and significantly decreases contacts with specialized nurses. Further research with pre-specified groups, as found in the subgroup analysis, is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00502255.
Boyne et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Heart failure (n=382). Tailored telemonitoring vs. Usual care was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalizations (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.35-1.17, p=0.151). Tailored telemonitoring did not significantly reduce heart failure hospitalizations compared with usual care over 1 year (9.1% vs 13.5%; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.35-1.17; P=0.151).