PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 4, 2021Hypertension280 citationsOpen Access

Adherence to Single-Pill Versus Free-Equivalent Combination Therapy in Hypertension

View Full Paper
GPGianfranco ParatiSKSverre E. KjeldsenACAntónio Coca

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine if single-pill combination therapy improves adherence, persistence, and blood pressure control compared to free-equivalent combination therapy in patients with hypertension.
  • Systematic review of 44 studies on antihypertensive therapy in adults aged ≥18 years.

Structured PICO

Does single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive therapy improve adherence, persistence, and blood pressure control compared with free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy in adults with hypertension?

P
Population
Adults with hypertension aged ≥18 years from 44 included studies
I
Intervention
Single-pill combination (SPC) antihypertensive therapy
C
Comparator
Free-equivalent combination (FEC) antihypertensive therapy
O
Outcome
Adherence, persistence, and reductions in systolic BP and/or diastolic BPsurrogate

Single-pill combination therapy for hypertension significantly improves medication adherence, persistence, and blood pressure control compared to free-equivalent combinations.

Abstract

Poor adherence to antihypertensive therapy is a major cause of poor blood pressure (BP) control in patients with hypertension. Regimen simplification may improve adherence and BP control. This systematic review assessed whether single-pill combination (SPC) therapy led to improved adherence, persistence, and better BP control compared with free-equivalent combination (FEC) therapy in patients with hypertension. PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched until July 2020, in addition to manual searching of relevant congress abstracts from 2014 to 2020 for studies including adults with hypertension aged ≥18 years receiving SPC or FEC antihypertensive therapy measuring any of the following: adherence, persistence, and reductions in systolic BP and/or diastolic BP. Adherence and persistence were summarized in a narrative analysis; direct pair-wise meta-analysis was conducted to compare BP reductions with SPC therapy versus FEC therapy using fixed-effect and random-effects models. Following screening, 44 studies were included. The majority (18 of 23) of studies measuring adherence showed adherence was significantly improved in patients receiving SPCs versus FECs. Overall, 16 studies measured persistence, of which 14 showed that patients receiving SPCs had significantly improved persistence or were significantly less likely to discontinue therapy than patients receiving FECs. Systolic BP (mean difference, -3.99 95% CI, -7.92 to -0.07; P=0.05) and diastolic BP (-1.54 95% CI, -2.67 to -0.41; P=0.0076) were both significantly reduced with SPC therapy compared with FEC therapy at week 12. SPC therapy leads to improved adherence and persistence compared with FEC therapy and may lead to better BP control in patients with hypertension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Parati et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d88db38c03fbaff8bef594https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15781
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper