Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective of this work was to deeper understand the influence of a grafted coupling agent in EVA/LLDPE based blends containing mineral filler acting as a flame‐retardant. EVA/LLDPE blends (50:50 phr) containing magnesium‐di‐hydroxide (MDH) were compounded. For comparison, parts (4%–5%) of LLDPE were substituted with MAA‐g‐LLDPE copolymer as a coupling agent. No influence of the coupling agent was observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermal analysis. A strong influence of different filler ratios (0%–60%) was detected by rheological investigations. Morphological studies revealed significant differences in blend morphology and filler location caused by phase transition which is close to the 50:50 composition. The coupling agent improved the compatibility of the blend in that a reduced phase size could be observed. The addition of the coupling agent relocated the mineral filler from being mainly located in the EVA phase into the interphase and created a connection between both polymeric phases which resulted in improved thermo‐mechanical performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heinz et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: