Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices

Saskia Hendriks; Christine Grady; Khara M. Ramos; Winston Chiong; Joseph J. Fins; Paul J. Ford; Sara Goering; Henry T. Greely; Katrina Hutchison; Michael L. Kelly; Scott Y. H. Kim; Eran Klein; Sarah H. Lisanby; Helen S. Mayberg; Hannah Maslen; Franklin G. Miller; Karen S. Rommelfanger; Sameer A. Sheth; Anna Wexler

doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Abstract

This ethical analysis and points to consider may assist researchers, institutional review boards, funders, and others engaged in human neural device research.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Hendriks et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d88f978cb8f39931ae33d7 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices

Ask about this paper

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading