Key result
A simulated stepwise lipid-lowering therapy approach post-CABG was cost-effective compared to observed clinical practice, with a median ICER of $15,232 per QALY gained.
Why the study?
Cost limits the wider use of PCSK9 inhibitors and newer lipid-lowering drugs after coronary artery bypass grafting, necessitating evaluation of cost effectiveness of an incremental lipid-lowering therapy approach.
Is a stepwise lipid-lowering therapy approach cost-effective compared to observed clinical practice in patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting?
Is a stepwise lipid-lowering therapy approach cost-effective compared to observed clinical practice in patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting?
Effect estimate: ICER 15232
A stepwise lipid-lowering approach prioritizing high-intensity statins and ezetimibe requires few post-CABG patients to need expensive PCSK9 inhibitors and is highly cost-effective.
BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is important for risk reduction for patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Cost limits the wider use of PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilsin/kexin type 9) inhibitors (PCSK9is) and newer drugs. Hence, mathematical modeling was performed on a nationwide cohort of US veterans post coronary artery bypass grafting to understand the need for expensive drugs like PCSK9is and the cost effectiveness of this model was evaluated. METHODS: First, Monte Carlo simulations were used to model the stepwise initiation of high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9i therapy for each patient to lower their low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels to recommended targets. Next, a lifetime Markov model was constructed with stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and mortality rates obtained our study cohort of nationwide US veterans post coronary artery bypass grafting. LLT treatment costs and quality adjusted life years were used to determine the cost effectiveness of this stepwise LLT approach versus observed clinical practice from the health care perspective. Probabilistic models were fit and results for cost effectiveness reported using incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality adjusted life year gained over the lifetime. RESULTS: For 27 443 US veterans post- coronary artery bypass grafting (mean age 66 years, 10% Black) with a median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 129 (interquartile range, 95.2-180) mg/dL, the 42% and 37% reached target LLT by statin intensification only and including ezetimibe, respectively. Only 6% required bempedoic acid or PCSK9is after the preceding steps. Such stepwise LLT reduction projected 0.8 life years gained over the 30-year period. With a median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of percent 15 232 (interquartile range, 13 520-17 769) per quality adjusted life year gained, this stepwise approach reached 100% probability for being cost effective (compared with observed clinical practice) at willingness-to-pay thresholds >$20 000. CONCLUSIONS: Few patients needed bempedoic acid or PCSK9is when simulating stepwise LLT with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Such an approach was observed as cost effective at very low willingness-to-pay thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deo et al. (2026) studied Post coronary artery bypass grafting (n=27,443). Stepwise lipid-lowering therapy vs. Observed clinical practice was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality adjusted life year gained (ICER 15232). A simulated stepwise lipid-lowering therapy approach post-CABG was cost-effective compared to observed clinical practice, with a median ICER of $15,232 per QALY gained.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: