Quantifies RF energy absorption in reproductive organs during smartphone contact, suggesting implications for health assessments.
Current radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) safety assessments predominantly focus on cranial exposure, while organ-specific dosimetry of the pelvic region under realistic smartphone body-contact conditions remains insufficiently characterised. This limitation constrains evidence-based evaluation of potential reproductive exposure during prolonged pocket storage. This study quantifies localised RF energy absorption in male and female reproductive organs using anatomically realistic voxel-based pelvic models integrated within a finite-difference time-domain computational framework. A multi-band smartphone antenna (900, 1800, 2600, and 3500 MHz) was simulated under three placement scenarios (0 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm separation), with peak spatial specific absorption rate calculated using both 1 g and 10 g averaging schemes. Thermal response was estimated using steady-state bioheat modelling. Zero-distance contact at 900 MHz produced maximum localised SAR values of 1.42 W/kg in the testes and 1.18 W/kg in the ovaries. Increasing separation to 10 mm reduced peak organ SAR by approximately 35–40 %. Higher frequencies demonstrated predominantly superficial energy deposition. Predicted temperature elevations remained below 0.25 °C across all tissues. Although values remained within international regulatory limits, near-field proximity substantially influenced organ-level exposure. These findings provide the first comparative high-resolution pelvic dosimetric analysis across gender under realistic contact scenarios and establish quantitative evidence to inform body-contact-aware compliance testing, smartphone design optimisation, and reproductive health risk assessment frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekolama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: