Retrospective analysis establishes a predictive model for complications in esophageal cancer surgery, suggesting improved interventions.
Objective: To analyze preoperative risk factors for complications following radical esophageal cancer surgery, and to establish a preoperative risk prediction model for postoperative complications, thereby providing a reference for medical staff to formulate and implement reasonable intervention measures for patients. Methods: Clinical data from 485 patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer were retrospectively collected and randomly divided into a training set (340 cases) and a validation set (145 cases) at a ratio of 7: 3. Independent predictors were identified by univariate logistic regression, LASSO regression, and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram model was constructed. The model's discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, DCA curves, and CIC curves. Results: The incidence of postoperative complications in this study was 36.9%. The proportions of various complication types were: pleural effusion 49.2%, aspiration pneumonia 7.3%, pulmonary infection 40.2%, pneumothorax 16.8%, atelectasis 2.8%, and respiratory failure 2.8%. Five predictors—age, BMI, underlying lung disease, NRS 2002 score, and tumor location—were included in the final model. The AUCs of the training set and validation set were 0.777 (95% CI: 0.725–0.829) and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.609–0.790), respectively, indicating good calibration and clinical practicability. Conclusion: The preoperative risk prediction model established in this study demonstrates good discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: