Background/Objectives: Delayed graft function (DGF) remains a common early complication after deceased donor kidney transplantation and is challenging to anticipate using routine pre-implant clinical variables alone. We investigated whether high-throughput Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of static cold storage preservation fluid (not machine perfusion perfusate) captures biochemical information associated with DGF and warrants further evaluation alongside routine pre-implant clinical predictors. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort, we analyzed preservation fluid samples from 56 kidney transplants originating from 49 deceased donors (7 donors contributed two kidneys); DGF occurred in 14/56 (25.0%). Dried-film FTIR spectra were acquired using a plate-based high-throughput accessory, and analyses focused on the fingerprint region (900–1800 cm−1) with prespecified preprocessing and quality control. We developed and compared clinical-only, FTIR-only, and combined predictive models and estimated performance using donor-blinded 5-fold StratifiedGroupKFold cross-validation (grouped by donor code) to prevent leakage across paired kidneys. Results: Donor-blinded discrimination (pooled out-of-fold ROC-AUC) was 0.775 for the clinical-only model, 0.814 for the FTIR-only model, and 0.796 for the combined model; probabilistic accuracy (Brier score; lower is better) was 0.162, 0.194, and 0.177, respectively. Calibration intercepts were negative and slopes were <1, indicating overly extreme risk estimates under strict donor-blinded validation and supporting recalibration prior to deployment. Decision curve analysis suggested a positive net benefit for clinically plausible thresholds. Conclusions: These findings support the feasibility of rapid, low-cost FTIR profiling of routinely available preservation fluid as a proof-of-concept approach for exploratory DGF risk stratification, rather than as a clinically deployable prediction tool. Given the small sample size and the instability of subgroup estimates, the main next steps are external validation in larger multicenter cohorts, prospective workflow studies, and model updating/recalibration.
Ramalhete et al. (Mon,) studied this question.