Comparative evaluation identifies optimal memory retrieval methods in multi-agent systems, enhancing efficiency.
Paper 2-1 in the Buddys Architecture Series. A supplementary paper to Paper 2 (DRM, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19211620). After three weeks of production deployment of DRM v1 with five LLM agents and over 200 memory entries, we observed score inflation: 54% of entries clustered at scores 9-10, degrading top-5 retrieval accuracy to 34.2%. We evaluated seven retrieval algorithms spanning information retrieval, cognitive science (ACT-R), and control theory (DNFO). The selected architecture — a three-layer cache combining category-level softmax gating, pointer-level multi-dimensional scoring with ACT-R activation dynamics, and on-demand content retrieval — achieved 100% accuracy across all six evaluation scenarios at 2.6 ms per ranking for N=200, using only keyword matching over Markdown files. No embeddings, no vector database, no GPU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takayuki Seki (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: