PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 10, 2026Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment0 citations

Reliability and Associations of English and Mandarin Vocabulary Measures in Infants and Toddlers Growing Up in a Multilingual Society

View Full Paper
SGShaun Kok Yew GohNanyang Technological UniversityVLV H LiewNanyang Technological UniversitySSSuzy J StylesNanyang Technological University

Key Points

  • The study investigates the reliability of vocabulary measures in English and Mandarin for infants and toddlers in a multilingual environment.
  • Used item-response Rasch models to examine reliability of vocabulary measures.
  • Collected vocabulary data from 137 children aged 5 to 27 months using a developmental vocabulary checklist.
  • Conducted one-way ANOVAs to analyze differences in DVC word categories based on language exposure.
  • Achieved high reliability scores (alpha .91 to .99) for English and Mandarin vocabulary measures.
  • Found significant differences in DVC word categories indicating varying language abilities.
  • Observed that higher exposure to Mandarin was linked to better vocabulary scores, particularly among older toddlers.

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the reliability of English and Mandarin vocabulary measures, and their associations, among infants and toddlers growing up in a multilingual society. Reliability was examined via item-response Rasch models across English and Mandarin word categories. Parents reported on 137 children’s (age = 5 to 27 months) English and Mandarin vocabulary with a newly developed measure, the developmental vocabulary checklist (DVC). High reliability (alpha .91 to .99) was observed across English and Mandarin DVC categories. Wright maps suggest a lack of sensitivity at the tail end of the language-ability distribution. One-way ANOVAs indicating a significant difference across expected categories of DVC words was found. Higher exposure associated with a higher composite score across DVC categories, but only in Mandarin and only among older children in the 1-to-2 year band. A threshold account is discussed as an explanation for differential association of exposure in Mandarin but not English.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Goh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895be6c1944d70ce06ceahttps://doi.org/10.1177/07342829261440789
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Modeling Dimensionality of Bilingual Kindergarteners' Language Knowledge in Spanish and English2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Two tongue tied: Bilingualism in Singapore1993 · 63 citations
  3. 3Differential effects of internal and external factors in early bilingual vocabulary learning: The case of Singapore2017 · 86 citations
  4. 4A review of questionnaires quantifying bilingual experience in children: Do they document the same constructs?2021 · 69 citations
  5. 5Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real World2008 · 6,207 citations