Compares community and hospital-acquired MRSA infections, highlighting distinct susceptibility patterns and implications for treatment.
Objectives: Traditionally, MRSA infections occurred exclusively in hospitals namely Hospital-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA).Recently however, community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has emerged in young individuals without risk factors for MRSA acquisition.Prevalence of CA-MRSA and its susceptibility to antibiotics have shown geographic variability.Methods: This study aims to provide regionally specific information on the proportion of CA-MRSA cases.Thirty non-duplicate MRSA isolated from different specimens for a period of three months were included in the study.Antibiotic susceptibilities and the important risk factors for infection were studied.The Fisher's exact test was done to determine the statistical significance.Results: 16.67% of our isolates were community-acquired and 83.33% were hospital-acquired.CA-MRSA isolates were distinct from HA-MRSA by their susceptibility patterns and risk factors.Conclusions: Beta-lactam antibiotics are usually the first line antibiotics used to treat a staphylococcal infection.Awareness about the existence of MRSA in the community is a must as the commonly used beta lactams have no role in treatment of these staphylococcal infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oommen et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: