Develops three short compassion scales to measure compassion for self, others, and from others, suggesting they are reliable and valid tools.
Objectives The current study aimed to develop and examine three brief, parallel short forms of the Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scales for measuring compassion for self (S-SOCS-S), for others (S-SOCS-O), and from others (S-SOCS-FO). Method Items were selected using the Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) algorithm, factor loadings, and theoretical evaluation of item content in a sample of 2009 Slovak helping professionals. We assessed convergent and divergent validity through scale correlations with anxiety, depression, self-criticism/reassurance and compassion fatigue/satisfaction measures. Results Three 10-item S-SOCS-S, S-SOCS-O, and S-SOCS-FO scales kept the original conceptual five-factor parallel structure (with two items per facet) and a general hierarchical compassion factor. They showed strong total-scale reliability (Cronbach's α > 0.80) and acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.915–0.970, RMSEA = 0.056–0.081, SRMR = 0.031–0.055). Convergent validity was supported by positive correlations with adaptive constructs (self-reassurance, compassion satisfaction) and negative correlations with maladaptive measures (self-criticism, burnout, compassion fatigue) in theoretically meaningful expected directions. Conclusions The S-SOCS-S, S-SOCS-O, and S-SOCS-FO scales are psychometrically sound and theoretically coherent: they retain the original scales' multifactorial compassion structure while efficiently measuring compassion for self, others, and from others. They offer a practical tool for research and clinical screening where rapid assessment of compassion is needed. Preregistration This study is not preregistered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halamová et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: