Tests enjoyment's impact on shooting performance in youth athletes using different training methods, suggesting a need for further exploration.
This study tested whether momentary enjoyment moderates within-session effects of Differential (DL) and Repetitive Learning (RL) on basketball shooting performance and perceived exertion (RPE) in youth athletes. Thirty-seven players were randomly assigned to DL (n = 19) or RL (n = 18) and completed 16 training sessions across eight weeks. Enjoyment was assessed after each session using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) and decomposed into within-person and between-person components. Performance outcomes included Stationary Shooting Accuracy Test (SSAT) scores before and after a 30-shot training task (30-STT), as well as accuracy during the 30-STT itself. RPE was recorded immediately following each session. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to analyze group effects and enjoyment-related moderators. Results showed that DL yielded superior performance in the 30-STT (β = 2.23, p = .011, d = 0.66) and substantially lower RPE compared with RL (β = −1.18, p < .001, d = −1.40), reflecting performance differences within the practiced task constraints rather than generalized shooting proficiency. We did not detect moderation of DL versus RL effects by enjoyment; however, confidence intervals for interaction terms and the limited variability in PACES indicate that small-to-moderate moderation effects cannot be ruled out. SSAT scores were similar between groups pre- and post-task, with explained variance driven primarily by individual differences rather than enjoyment changes. Training structure accounted for immediate performance and RPE differences independently of post-session enjoyment, though this does not preclude the importance of affective states, which require more comprehensive assessment and ecologically valid performance measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burkaitė et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: