Why the study?
Does exclusive thoracic placement and deeper insertion of epidural catheters reduce lower leg motor weakness and premature catheter dislodgement in patients after major abdominal surgery?
Does exclusive thoracic placement and deeper insertion of epidural catheters reduce lower leg motor weakness and premature catheter dislodgement in patients after major abdominal surgery?
Exclusive thoracic placement and deeper insertion of epidural catheters significantly reduced postoperative lower leg motor weakness and premature catheter dislodgement after major abdominal surgery.
May support thoracic epidural preference with deeper insertion after abdominal surgery; hypothesis-generating pending randomized confirmation.
In a quality improvement audit on epidural analgesia in 300 patients after major abdominal surgery, we identified postoperative lower leg weakness and premature catheter dislodgement as the most frequent causes of premature discontinuation of postoperative epidural infusion. Lower limb motor weakness occurred in more than half of the patients with lumbar epidural analgesia. In a second period monitoring 177 patients, lumbar catheter insertion was abandoned in favour of exclusive thoracic placement for epidural catheters. Additionally, to prevent outward movement, the catheters were inserted deeper into the epidural space (mean (SD) 5.2 (1.5) cm in Period Two vs 4.6 (1.3) cm in Period One). Lower leg motor weakness declined from 14.7% to 5.1% (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.74) between the two periods. Similarly, the frequency of premature catheter dislodgement was reduced from 14.5% to 5.7% (odds ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.17-0.72). With a stepwise logistic regression model we demonstrated that the odds of premature catheter dislodgement was reduced by 43% for each centimetre of additional catheter advancement in Period Two. We conclude that careful audit of specific complications can usefully guide changes in practice that improve success of epidural analgesia regimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Königsrainer et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: