PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2024Heart Rhythm56 citationsOpen Access

Pulsed-field vs cryoballoon vs radiofrequency ablation: Outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

TKThomas KuefferRSRobin StettlerJMJens Maurhofer

Structured PICO

Does pulsed-field ablation or cryoballoon ablation improve 1-year outcomes compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation?

P
Population
Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)
I
Intervention
Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA)
C
Comparator
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
O
Outcome
1-year confounder-adjusted outcomes

Pulsed-field and cryoballoon ablation may offer better 1-year outcomes than radiofrequency ablation for first-time pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation.

Abstract

In patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI, 1-year confounder-adjusted outcomes are better with PFA and CBA than with RFA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kueffer et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d89dd68c03fbaff8befaf3https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.045
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper