This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The MMR-RHS may improve the quality and transparency of MMR by supporting investigators, authors, reviewers, and editors during project development, manuscript preparation, and critical review. The tool may assist readers in critical appraisal, knowledge translation, and application of published MMR findings. Ultimately, the MMR-RHS may help legitimize mixed methods in rehabilitation and health research, an important step toward understanding the complexities of health care, patient outcomes, and evolving societal health needs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tovin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: