PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 13, 2007New England Journal of Medicine1,196 citationsOpen Access

Long-Term Outcomes with Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Sweden

View Full Paper
BLBo LagerqvistSJStefan JamesUSUlf Stenestrand

Key Points

  • To assess the long-term clinical safety and mortality risks associated with drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents.
  • Comparative long-term outcome analysis evaluating patients receiving drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.

Structured PICO

Do drug-eluting stents increase the rate of death compared to bare-metal stents in patients in Sweden?

P
Population
Patients in Sweden
I
Intervention
Drug-eluting stents
C
Comparator
Bare-metal stents
O
Outcome
Rate of deathhard clinical

In this Swedish cohort, drug-eluting stents were associated with a slightly higher long-term risk of death and myocardial infarction compared to bare-metal stents, highlighting the need for randomized trial confirmation.

Limitations

  • Observational design (long-term safety needs to be ascertained in large, randomized trials)

Abstract

Drug-eluting stents were associated with an increased rate of death, as compared with bare-metal stents. This trend appeared after 6 months, when the risk of death was 0.5 percentage point higher and a composite of death or myocardial infarction was 0.5 to 1.0 percentage point higher per year. The long-term safety of drug-eluting stents needs to be ascertained in large, randomized trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lagerqvist et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8a96e8c03fbaff8befd27https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067722
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper