Effective communication rests at the core of medicine, especially when patients are confronted with progressive disease and death. Communication can mitigate the distress of receiving bad news and influence patients’ psychological functioning and adaptation to a new situation. 1-3 Whereas the benefits of good communication might seem clear, the costs of its failure are perhaps even clearer. Especially in progressive disease (which we define as entailing palliative and endof-life care in worsening serious illness) with guarded prognoses and significant psychosocial stressors, the stakes are high in most if not every clinical encounter with patients and families. Communication deficits cause unnecessary distress not only for patients but also their loved ones. 4 It is not surprising that most formal complaints in health care are believed to be related to communication. 5,6 Herein, we therefore tackle the central question that remains: what is good, effective communication in progressive disease and how can it be taught, evaluated, and implemented to improve patient outcomes? In medical consultations, patients experience a double-need: to
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vliet et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: