⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

November 3, 2016International Endodontic Journal

Apical transportation and canal straightening with different continuously tapered rotary file systems in severely curved root canals: F6 SkyTaper and OneShape versus Mtwo

Sebastian Bürklein P Jäger Edgar Schäfer

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Under the conditions of this study, all instruments respected the original canal curvature well and apical transportation was negligible. Instruments were safe to use. Preparation with F6 SkyTaper and OneShape was faster than with Mtwo.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Bürklein et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8d0cdade63f05b9bed946 https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12716

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel‐titanium instrumentsOriginal Research · 2006 · 36 citations
2Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teethOriginal Research · 2011 · 36 citations
3Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaperOriginal Research · 2011 · 565 citations
4Shaping ability of different single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teethOriginal Research · 2012 · 183 citations
5Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single‐file systems: R eciproc, F 360 and O ne S hape versus M twoIn Vitro Study · 2013 · 202 citations