Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper is aimed at deriving the universality of the largest eigenvalue of a class of high-dimensional real or complex sample covariance matrices of the form WN=Σ1/2XX*Σ1/2. Here, X=(xᵢⱼ)M,N is an M× N random matrix with independent entries xᵢⱼ, 1≤ i≤ M, 1≤ j≤ N such that Exᵢⱼ=0, E|xᵢⱼ|²=1/N. On dimensionality, we assume that $M=M(N)$ and N/M→ d∈(0,∞) as N→∞. For a class of general deterministic positive-definite M× M matrices Σ, under some additional assumptions on the distribution of xᵢⱼ’s, we show that the limiting behavior of the largest eigenvalue of WN is universal, via pursuing a Green function comparison strategy raised in [Probab. Theory Related Fields 154 (2012) 341–407, Adv. Math. 229 (2012) 1435–1515] by Erdős, Yau and Yin for Wigner matrices and extended by Pillai and Yin [Ann. Appl. Probab. 24 (2014) 935–1001] to sample covariance matrices in the null case (Σ=I). Consequently, in the standard complex case (Exᵢⱼ²=0), combing this universality property and the results known for Gaussian matrices obtained by El Karoui in [Ann. Probab. 35 (2007) 663–714] (nonsingular case) and Onatski in [Ann. Appl. Probab. 18 (2008) 470–490] (singular case), we show that after an appropriate normalization the largest eigenvalue of WN converges weakly to the type 2 Tracy–Widom distribution TW₂. Moreover, in the real case, we show that when Σ is spiked with a fixed number of subcritical spikes, the type 1 Tracy–Widom limit TW₁ holds for the normalized largest eigenvalue of WN, which extends a result of Féral and Péché in [J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 073302] to the scenario of nondiagonal Σ and more generally distributed X. In summary, we establish the Tracy–Widom type universality for the largest eigenvalue of generally distributed sample covariance matrices under quite light assumptions on Σ. Applications of these limiting results to statistical signal detection and structure recognition of separable covariance matrices are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: