Why the study?
Human infections with avian-origin influenza A(H7N9) virus pose a serious threat to global health, but treatment options remain limited.
Does baloxavir marboxil reduce virus titers and protect against lethal challenge in models of avian-origin influenza A(H7N9)?
Does baloxavir marboxil reduce virus titers and protect against lethal challenge in models of avian-origin influenza A(H7N9)?
Baloxavir marboxil demonstrates potent antiviral activity and provides complete protection against lethal avian-origin influenza A(H7N9) infection in mice, supporting its potential for human treatment.
Supports preclinical development for H7N9; leaves open human efficacy pending clinical trials.
Human infections with avian-origin influenza A(H7N9) virus represent a serious threat to global health; however, treatment options are limited. Here, we show the inhibitory effects of baloxavir acid (BXA) and its prodrug baloxavir marboxil (BXM), a first-in-class cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor, against A(H7N9), in vitro and in vivo. In cell culture, BXA at four nanomolar concentration achieved a 1.5-2.8 log reduction in virus titers of A(H7N9), including the NA-R292K mutant virus and highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses, whereas NA inhibitors or favipiravir required approximately 20-fold or higher concentrations to achieve the same levels of reduction. A(H7N9)-specific amino acid polymorphism at position 37, implicated in BXA binding to the PA endonuclease domain, did not impact on BXA susceptibility. In mice, oral administration of BXM at 5 and 50 mg/kg twice a day for 5 days completely protected from a lethal A/Anhui/1/2013 (H7N9) challenge, and reduced virus titers more than 2-3 log in the lungs. Furthermore, the potent therapeutic effects of BXM in mice were still observed when a higher virus dose was administered or treatment was delayed up to 48 hours post infection. These findings support further investigation of BXM for A(H7N9) treatment in humans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taniguchi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: