Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: During the past three decades, the concepts of recovery and person-centredness have become familiar in mental health policy, practice and research, as well as in the voicing of service users’ experiences of moving from mental distress and processes towards wellbeing and citizenship. Recovery, like person-centredness, is about a person retaining and keeping control over their life situation and being assisted in making informed decisions, and about supporting real partnerships between persons, families and services. : The aim of the article is to discuss the roots and developments of recovery and person-centredness, highlight some key strategies of these practice developments and show how the concepts and practices can nurture each other. this article adds to the topic: The roots of recovery are based in service user and activist organisations, and in disability movements, while the roots of person-centeredness can be traced back to Carl Rogers’ work from the early 1940s, and also to humanistic-existentialist oriented models of care in the 1960 and 1970s. The two concepts are interdependent in that they presuppose each other. The key aspects of recovery can be summed up as: as a spontaneous, natural event as consequence of active treatment despite symptoms and functional impairments is a personal, social and a spiritual process. Person-centredness is regarded as an essential component in good-quality care, and is understood as conveying a holistic approach characterised by respect for individuals and their unique experiences and needs. for practice: To make recovery and person-centredness influential in practice, four strategies are outlined: the radical change involved in placing the person at the centre mental health problems as both personal and social and using knowledge embedded in the lived experience of service users, family members and practitioners genuine attention to the spiritual process of recovery
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hummelvol et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: