What question did this study set out to answer?

Examine the philosophical status of constructivism and evaluate the theoretical divisions among its competing branches within educational research.

October 1, 1995Educational Researcher

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

DPD. C. Phillips

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Theoretical review uncovers sectarian divisions within constructivist frameworks in educational scholarship, highlighting conflicting models of human knowledge acquisition.

Key Points

Examine the philosophical status of constructivism and evaluate the theoretical divisions among its competing branches within educational research.
Conducted a critical theoretical evaluation of constructivist thought across educational research literature.
Analyzed constructivism through the conceptual lens of foundational origin narratives and secular belief systems.
Demonstrates that constructivism operates as a symbolic cultural narrative regarding knowledge acquisition rather than a purely neutral empirical theory.
Identifies substantial fragmentation and sectarian rivalry among distinct constructivist epistemologies within educational theory.

Cite This Study

D. C. Phillips (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8efbc2c39562886ae3444 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x024007005

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Theoretical review uncovers sectarian divisions within constructivist frameworks in educational scholarship, highlighting conflicting models of human knowledge acquisition.

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider