Does cardiac magnetic resonance tissue characterization and clinical phenotyping differentiate left ventricular involvement in ARVC from dilated cardiomyopathy?
240 patients, comprising 87 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (median age 34 years) and 153 with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (median age 51 years).
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with quantitative tissue characterization
Comparison between ARVC patients with left ventricular (LV) involvement and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)
Prevalence of left ventricular (LV) involvement and differential diagnostic features (clinical, electrocardiographic, and imaging) between ARVC-LV phenotype and DCMsurrogate
Cardiac magnetic resonance reveals that left ventricular involvement is common in ARVC and can be reliably differentiated from dilated cardiomyopathy by a high burden of subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement (≥20% of LV mass).
Background This study assessed the prevalence of left ventricular (LV) involvement and characterized the clinical, electrocardiographic, and imaging features of LV phenotype in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Differential diagnosis between ARVC-LV phenotype and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) was evaluated. Methods and Results The study population included 87 ARVC patients (median age 34 years) and 153 DCM patients (median age 51 years). All underwent cardiac magnetic resonance with quantitative tissue characterization. Fifty-eight ARVC patients (67%) had LV involvement, with both LV systolic dysfunction and LV late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 41/58 (71%) and LV-LGE in isolation in 17 (29%). Compared with DCM, the ARVC-LV phenotype was statistically significantly more often characterized by low QRS voltages in limb leads, T-wave inversion in the inferolateral leads and major ventricular arrhythmias. LV-LGE was found in all ARVC patients with LV systolic dysfunction and in 69/153 (45%) of DCM patients. Patients with ARVC and LV systolic dysfunction had a greater amount of LV-LGE (25% versus 13% of LV mass; Pr=-0.63; Pr=-0.01; P=0.94). Conclusions LV involvement in ARVC is common and characterized by clinical and cardiac magnetic resonance features which differ from those seen in DCM. The most distinctive feature of ARVC-LV phenotype is the large amount of LV-LGE/fibrosis, which impacts directly and negatively on the LV systolic function.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alberto Cipriani
Electrophysiology
Barbara Bauce
Electrophysiology
Manuel De Lazzari
Electrophysiology
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Journal of the American Heart Association
University College London
University of Padua
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cipriani et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8f3a6183921ebcaae41c1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.119.014628
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: