Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Decisions regarding life-sustaining treatment after devastating brain injury are crafted in a stepwise manner. Feelings of doubt are frequent and seem to be linked to the recognition of fallibility. Doubt can be seen as positive and can foster open-mindedness towards the view of others, which is one of the prerequisites for a good ethical climate. Doubt in this context tends to be mitigated by open interdisciplinary discussions acknowledging doubt as rational and a normal feature of complex decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robertsen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: