⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

August 27, 2014The Journal of Vascular Access

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of three different types of Valved and Non-Valved Peripherally inserted Central Catheters

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

No abstract yet

We only have this paper's title and publication details.

Read it at the source→

Abstract

We found no clinical advantages of valved vs. non-valved PICCs.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Pittiruti et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9322bc7f0c3ae80a3c358 https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000280

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1High rate of complications associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in patients with solid tumoursRetrospective Study · 2004 · 110 citations
2Two-Year Trends of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Line Complications at a Tertiary-Care Hospital Role of Nursing ExpertiseCohort Study · 2001 · 44 citations
3The Use of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (Picc) in the Hospital EnvironmentRetrospective Study · 2010 · 17 citations