Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We found reductions in peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) complication rates over 2 years of observation (20.4 vs 13.8/1,000 line-days; relative risk, 0.5-0.9). This difference represents a cost saving due to reduced line reinsertions and reduced use of thrombolytic agents. The presence of a dedicated PICC insertion nursing team and education of ward nurses in PICC maintenance is a plausible explanation for the observed differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funk et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: