We present a versatile computer model of diverse dynamic combinatorial libraries, and examine how molecular recognition between library members and a template can be used to amplify the best binders. The correlation between host-guest binding and amplification was examined for a set of 50 libraries with >300 components each over a wide range of template and building block concentrations. Depending on these concentrations correlations vary from poor (when using a large excess of template) to good (for very dilute libraries and/or substoichiometric template concentrations), highlighting the need to choose the experimental conditions for dynamic combinatorial libraries thoughtfully.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corbett et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: