Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fertilizer placement is often designed to improve nutrient availability. Our objective was to determine the effect of P and K rate and placement in no‐till and strip‐till on grain yield; water, P, and K values in the soil; and the distribution of corn ( Zea mays L.) roots. A 4‐yr field experiment was setup near Urbana, IL, with a corn–soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. Tillage/fertilizer placement was the main plot [no‐till/broadcast (NTBC), no‐till/deep band (NTDB), and strip‐till/deep band (STDB)]; deep band was 15‐cm beneath the crop row. Phosphorus fertilizer rate (0, 12, 24, and 36 kg P ha −1 yr −1 ) was the subplot, and K‐fertilizer rate (0, 42, 84, and 168 kg K ha −1 yr −1 ) was the sub‐subplot. Measurements included grain yield and yield components, grain and shoot P and K concentrations, root parameters, and soil‐water, P, and K values. Strip‐till/deep band produced greater kernels row −1 and 9.43 Mg ha −1 yield that was 7.8% greater than NTBC and 7.9% greater than NTDB. Deep banding increased soil P and K test values beneath the crop row and lowered soil surface test values compared with broadcast applications, but had no effect on root distribution. Across treatments, greatest apparent P and K uptake occurred in the surface layer where most roots were present and where precipitation replenished water to a greater extent than deeper layers. Relative to NTBC, STDB had 24% greater apparent‐P and 23% greater apparent‐K uptake rates. The results indicate that improved conditions for nutrient uptake provide a competitive advantage for production with STDB relative to no‐till treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: