Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It’s often hypothesized that the structure of mental representation is map‐like rather than language‐like. The possibility arises as a counterexample to the argument from the best explanation of productivity and systematicity to the language of thought hypothesis—the hypothesis that mental structure is compositional and recursive. In this paper, I argue that the analogy with maps does not undermine the argument, because maps and language have the same kind of compositional and recursive structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ben Blumson (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: