PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2004New England Journal of Medicine3,417 citationsOpen Access

A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer

View Full Paper
HNHeidi Nelson

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

In this multi-institutional study, the rates of recurrent cancer were similar after laparoscopically assisted colectomy and open colectomy, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach is an acceptable alternative to open surgery for colon cancer.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Heidi Nelson (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9559c5e5bcb4e3b835a4ahttps://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa032651
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations1992 · 45,555 citations
  2. 2Laparoscopie Colectomy1992 · 336 citations
  3. 3A Prospective Analysis of 1518 Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies1991 · 1,444 citations
  4. 4Sequential Treatment Assignment with Balancing for Prognostic Factors in the Controlled Clinical Trial1975 · 2,392 citations
  5. 5Proposed phase III trial comparing laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer.1995 · 72 citations