Key result
Osimertinib-savolitinib cuts disease progression risk ~45% vs. platinum-pemetrexed in MET-altered, EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
Why the study?
Does osimertinib plus savolitinib improve progression-free survival compared to intravenous platinum-pemetrexed in patients with EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with MET overexpression or amplification that progressed during osimertinib therapy?
RCT (n=338)
Open-label (blinded independent central review for primary end point)
1:1 ratio
Yes
Does osimertinib plus savolitinib improve progression-free survival compared to intravenous platinum-pemetrexed in patients with EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with MET overexpression or amplification that progressed during osimertinib therapy?
In patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC and MET overexpression or amplification progressing on osimertinib, combination therapy with osimertinib and savolitinib significantly improved both progression-free and overall survival compared to platinum-pemetrexed chemotherapy.
Opens a new treatment axis for MET-altered EGFR-mutated NSCLC; extends precision approaches to MET-driven resistance.
BackgroundSavolitinib is an oral, potent, highly selective MET–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Combination therapy with savolitinib and osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–TKI, has shown activity in patients with EGFR-mutated, advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET overexpression, MET amplification, or both, after progression during EGFR-TKI therapy. MethodsIn this international, phase 3, open-label trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with MET overexpression (staining intensity of 3+ for MET in ≥90% of tumor cells on immunohistochemical analysis), MET amplification (≥10 gene copies on fluorescence in situ hybridization), or both whose disease had progressed during osimertinib therapy to receive osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) plus savolitinib (300 mg twice daily) or intravenous platinum–pemetrexed. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. ResultsOf the 1746 patients screened, 338 were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib–savolitinib (171 patients) or platinum–pemetrexed (167 patients). Osimertinib–savolitinib led to significantly longer progression-free survival than platinum–pemetrexed (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.72; P<0.001), as well as significantly longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.91; P=0.01; final analysis). The Kaplan–Meier estimate of 12-month progression-free survival was 36% in the osimertinib–savolitinib group and 10% in the platinum–pemetrexed group, and the estimate of 12-month overall survival was 70% and 53%, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events that occurred during treatment in the osimertinib–savolitinib group were peripheral edema (in 49% of the patients), anemia (in 26%), and diarrhea (in 26%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events during treatment were reported in 64% of the patients in the osimertinib–savolitinib group and in 63% of those in the platinum–pemetrexed group. ConclusionsOsimertinib–savolitinib led to significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than platinum–pemetrexed among patients with EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with MET overexpression, MET amplification, or both that had progressed during osimertinib therapy (Funded by AstraZeneca; SAFFRON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05261399.)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in EGFR-mutated, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET overexpression or amplification (n=338). Osimertinib plus savolitinib vs. Intravenous platinum-pemetrexed was evaluated on Progression-free survival, as assessed by blinded independent central review (Kaplan-Meier estimate of 12-month progression-free survival) (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.72, p=<0.001). Osimertinib-savolitinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with platinum-pemetrexed in MET-altered, EGFR-mutated NSCLC (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.42-0.72; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: