What question did this study set out to answer?

To examine the continuum between diverse rapid review methodologies and traditional systematic reviews, focusing on the implications of streamlined processes.

July 19, 2010Implementation ScienceOpen Access

Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To examine the continuum between diverse rapid review methodologies and traditional systematic reviews, focusing on the implications of streamlined processes.
Evaluated methodological approaches across the spectrum from rapid reviews to conventional systematic reviews.
Assessed publication trends, reporting transparency, and the potential introduction of bias resulting from streamlined review techniques.
A single standardized methodological approach is not universally optimal, necessitating detailed reporting of specific methods to clarify potential bias.
Further comparative investigations between full systematic reviews and rapid reviews are required to determine methodological boundaries and limitations qualitatively.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Methodological review examines rapid review methods in evidence synthesis, highlighting the need for transparent reporting and bias assessment.

Cite This Study

Ganann et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d95f3af20ef26330684a49 https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-56

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Methodological review examines rapid review methods in evidence synthesis, highlighting the need for transparent reporting and bias assessment.

Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider