Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background/Objectives: Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathophysiology of endometriosis, contributing to inflammation, immune dysregulation, and lesion progression. This has led to growing interest in antioxidant-based strategies as potential supportive interventions. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, covering studies published from database inception until the end of January 2026. The review focused on clinically relevant endpoints, including pain intensity, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, reproductive parameters, and quality of life. Results: Among the analyzed interventions, the most consistent clinical effects were observed with melatonin, with randomized controlled trials indicating a moderate reduction in pain. N-acetylcysteine shows potentially beneficial effects; however, the available clinical data remain limited and heterogeneous. For other supplements, the evidence is inconsistent or insufficient to support clear clinical conclusions, and in many cases relies on indirect or mechanistic findings rather than well-established clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Current evidence does not support the use of non-mineral antioxidant supplements as standalone therapy for endometriosis. They may be considered as adjunctive strategies, although their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain and requires confirmation in well-designed randomized clinical trials.
Pokorska-Niewiada et al. (Thu,) studied this question.