This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Limited compliance with international consensus guidelines on phenotypic definition and mediocre reporting of CP case ascertainment hinders the comparison of results among genetic studies of CP (including meta-analyses), thereby limiting the quality, interpretability, and generalizability of study findings. Compliance with the SCPE guidelines is important for ongoing gene discovery efforts in CP, given the potential for misclassification of unrelated neurological conditions as CP.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: