Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There were 18 primary articles that met the selection criteria, including a total of 3913 women and forty-one 2 x 2 tables. In women with pre-eclampsia, a positive test result of uric acid greater than or equal to a 350-micromol/l threshold predicted eclampsia with a pooled likelihood ratio (LR) of 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.5), while a negative test result had a pooled LR of 0.38 (95% CI 0.18-0.81). For severe hypertension as the outcome measure, the LRs were 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.2) and 0.49 (95% CI 0.38-0.64) for positive and negative test results, respectively, and for caesarean section the LRs were 2.4 (95% CI 1.3-4.7) and 0.39 (95% CI 0.20-0.76). For stillbirths and neonatal deaths the respective LRs were 1.5 (95% CI 0.91-2.6) and 0.51 (95% CI 0.20-1.3). For the prediction of small-for-gestational-age fetus, the pooled LRs were 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.7) and 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.83) for positive and negative results, respectively. AUTHOR'S CONCLUSION: Serum uric acid is a poor predictor of maternal and fetal complications in women with pre-eclampsia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thangaratinam et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: