This article describes an attempt to bring disciplinary historical inquiry into the social studies classroom. This work emerges from a five-school 6-month intervention in San Francisco, 'Reading like a Historian', which found main effects for student learning across four quantitative measures: historical thinking, factual knowledge, general reasoning, and reading comprehension. The purpose here is to describe the pedagogical practices that were at the heart of the intervention; in particular, a lesson structure that is called the Document-Based Lesson. The Document-Based Lesson organized existing forms of social organization that typify social studies classrooms (e.g. lecture, recitation, seatwork, group-work, whole-class discussion), into a predictable and repeatable sequence that engaged students in the processes of historical inquiry. Rather than uproot the conventional norms and structures that define classroom behaviour, this study preserved the traditional role of the teacher and the signature activities that stand as landmarks of social studies instruction. Moreover, by providing classroom-ready materials and activities that married content knowledge and disciplinary inquiry, the Document-Based Lesson attempted to reconcile the fundamental tension in history instruction between depth and coverage. Keywords: historyinstructionsocial studiescurriculum reformliteracy Acknowledgements This work emerged from the Reading Like a Historian Project, funded by the Stanford K-12 Initiative, Sam Wineburg, Principal Investigator. I was also supported by the National Academy of Education Predoctoral Fellowship in Adolescent Literacy. This support is gratefully acknowledged; however, I alone am responsible for the contents of this article. I extend special thanks to Sam Wineburg for his comments on earlier versions of this paper, as well as to Brad Fogo, for his ongoing collaboration and insight into effective instruction. Notes 1. At the time of this writing, our curriculum website displays over 110,000 downloads of curricular materials. 2. See 'Reading Like a Historian' video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWz08mVUIt8
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abby Reisman (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: