This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This research documented substantial variability in the proportion of children who are likely to be eligible for Part C services. Most states have adopted eligibility definitions that make many more children candidates for Part C early intervention than they serve. However, current rates of enrollment are insufficient to serve all children with delays that fall under 2 SDs below the mean on any of the 5 developmental domains that are required to be evaluated by Part C regulations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosenberg et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: