Why the study?
What are the physiologic and non-physiologic bases for side effects associated with ACE inhibitor therapy?
What are the physiologic and non-physiologic bases for side effects associated with ACE inhibitor therapy?
This review highlights the physiologic and non-physiologic basis for side effects of ACE inhibitors, emphasizing the need for physician vigilance in patients with comorbid cardiac or renal conditions.
Heightened vigilance advised for ACE inhibitor side effects with cardiac/renal comorbidities; extends mechanistic insights but leaves open prospective validation.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are increasingly recognized as having an important role in the treatment of hypertension and/or end-organ disease. The sheer number of ACE inhibitors in the United States--now numbering 10 different chemical entities--has created a sense of comfort with these compounds, which is particularly evident when these compounds are used in the patient with essential hypertension; conversely, when comorbid conditions are present in the ACE inhibitor-treated patient, circumstances change and physician vigilance becomes more of a necessity. ACE inhibitor therapy in patients with either cardiac and/or renal disease is as much an art as it is a science, and even in the most skilled hands can prove a challenging undertaking. This review discusses the physiologic and non-physiologic basis for side effects with ACE inhibition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Domenic A. Sica (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: