Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Much contemporary dialogue has centered on the difficulty of establishing validity criteria in qualitative research. Developing validity standards in qualitative research is challenging because of the necessity to incorporate rigor and subjectivity as well as creativity into the scientific process. This article explores the extant issues related to the science and art of qualitative research and proposes a synthesis of contemporary viewpoints. A distinction between primary and secondary validity criteria in qualitative research is made with credibility, authenticity, criticality, and integrity identified as primary validity criteria and explicitness, vividness, creativity, thoroughness, congruence, and sensitivity identified as secondary validity criteria.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Robin Whittemore
Yale University
Susan K. Chase
University of Central Florida
Carol Lynn Mandle
Boston College
Qualitative Health Research
Yale University
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Whittemore et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d969e02a25b240b7a3c2fa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299