Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standard defenses of ontological individualism are challenged by arguments that exploit the dependence of social facts on material facts—that is, facts that are not about human individuals. In this article, I discuss Brian Epstein’s “materialism” in The Ant Trap : granting Epstein’s strict definition of individualism, I show that his arguments depend crucially on a generous conception of social properties and social facts. Individualists, however, are only committed to the claim that projectible properties are individualistically realized, and materialists have not undermined this claim.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Francesco Guala (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: