What question did this study set out to answer?

To evaluate research co-design approaches in health and establish a structured framework for co-design evaluation across all project stages.

September 11, 2024SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaOpen Access

Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To evaluate research co-design approaches in health and establish a structured framework for co-design evaluation across all project stages.
Synthesized evidence through a systematic overview of existing reviews on research co-design in health.
Engaged diverse stakeholders collaboratively to formulate and refine the evaluation framework.
Established the Co-Design Evaluation Framework structured for prospective planning, concurrent monitoring, and retrospective assessment.
Outlined practical applications enabling stakeholders to modify ongoing co-design activities and extract lessons from completed projects to guide future health initiatives.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Systematic overview demonstrates a stakeholder-developed Co-Design Evaluation Framework in health research, highlighting adaptable assessment across project lifespans.

Cite This Study

Peters et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d984ed0d540cafc583603a https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01394-4

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Systematic overview demonstrates a stakeholder-developed Co-Design Evaluation Framework in health research, highlighting adaptable assessment across project lifespans.

Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider