PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2017Brain604 citationsOpen Access

Slow wave sleep disruption increases cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β levels

View Full Paper
YJYo‐El S. JuSOSharon OomsCSCourtney L. Sutphen

Key Points

  • This research investigates how different aspects of sleep impact amyloid-β and other biomarkers related to Alzheimer's disease.
  • Seventeen healthy adults aged 35-65 underwent 5-14 days of actigraphy followed by slow wave activity disruption during polysomnogram.
  • Cerebrospinal fluid was collected for measurement of amyloid-β, tau, total protein, YKL-40, and hypocretin after the disruption.
  • Data were compared against a sham condition during the polysomnogram.
  • Specific disruption of slow wave activity increased amyloid-β40 levels (r = 0.610, P = 0.009).
  • Worse sleep quality correlated with higher tau levels (r = 0.543, P = 0.045).
  • Disruption effects were specific to neuronally-derived proteins, indicating changes in neuronal activity during disrupted sleep.

Abstract

See Mander et al. (doi:10.1093/awx174) for a scientific commentary on this article.Sleep deprivation increases amyloid-β, suggesting that chronically disrupted sleep may promote amyloid plaques and other downstream Alzheimer's disease pathologies including tauopathy or inflammation. To date, studies have not examined which aspect of sleep modulates amyloid-β or other Alzheimer's disease biomarkers. Seventeen healthy adults (age 35-65 years) without sleep disorders underwent 5-14 days of actigraphy, followed by slow wave activity disruption during polysomnogram, and cerebrospinal fluid collection the following morning for measurement of amyloid-β, tau, total protein, YKL-40, and hypocretin. Data were compared to an identical protocol, with a sham condition during polysomnogram. Specific disruption of slow wave activity correlated with an increase in amyloid-β40 (r = 0.610, P = 0.009). This effect was specific for slow wave activity, and not for sleep duration or efficiency. This effect was also specific to amyloid-β, and not total protein, tau, YKL-40, or hypocretin. Additionally, worse home sleep quality, as measured by sleep efficiency by actigraphy in the six nights preceding lumbar punctures, was associated with higher tau (r = 0.543, P = 0.045). Slow wave activity disruption increases amyloid-β levels acutely, and poorer sleep quality over several days increases tau. These effects are specific to neuronally-derived proteins, which suggests they are likely driven by changes in neuronal activity during disrupted sleep.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ju et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d99bac8d5c517421a3c114https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx148
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper